Syntheroid is unquestionably the #1 testosterone supplement that's ever been available. The revolutionary formula is proven to dramatically boost testosterone levels more powerfully than any other testosterone booster on the market. And every order is 100% GUARANTEED to deliver results!Click To Learn More About The #1 Rated Testosterone Supplement
Erase Pro Review
Physique Enhancing Science (PES) is a company that is quickly becoming popular among the underground gym culture. Erase Pro is a supercharged version of their original Erase, providing extra support for reducing cortisol and inhibiting estrogen.
Blocking estrogen signals the body to produce more testosterone, thus increasing strength, vitality and sex drive. So how effective is Erase Pro? I poured through all the available information to provide a detailed background on everything you need to know before you buy.
How Erase Pro Works
Erase Pro is an aromatase inhibitor. It prevents certain enzymes from converting testosterone to estrogen. Erase Pro also stops estrogen from binding to certain receptors, lowering estrogen and increasing testosterone.
Erase Pro features a simple formula based on three key ingredients:
Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione is the main ingredient in the original Erase, and a metabolite of 7-Keto DHEA. This provides 2 for 1 anabolic modulation by blocking estrogen and increasing testosterone.
Boerhaavia diffusa root extract has demonstrated in studies the ability to prevent estrogen from binding to its receptor site.  When the body senses low estrogen levels, it responds by producing more testosterone.
In addition to blocking estrogen, animal studies of this extract demonstrate its ability to act as an anti-catabolic agent. Essentially, this ingredient blunts the effects of the stress hormone cortisol. 
Euonymus alatus root extract inhibits intracellular aromatase. By acting on cell lines containing high levels of aromatase enzymes, it effectively reduces estrogen.
How to Take Erase Pro
This is one of the most convenient testosterone boosting supplements. Unlike others that make you divide up doses throughout the day, Erase Pro only requires you to take one pill in the morning with breakfast.
It is also recommended to take Erase Pro for 8 weeks with a 4 week break in between cycles.
What’s Are the Differences Between Erase and Erase Pro?
Erase consists entirely of the anti-aromatase Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione. Erase Pro not only contains a higher concentration of Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione, it has also added boerhaavia diffusa and euonymus alatus. These also work to block estrogen and increase testosterone levels.
How Much Does Erase Pro Cost?
Erase Pro is currently selling for $69.99 on its official website. Websites such as Amazon.com and GNC.com, however, have it on sale for much lower.
Erase Pro Side Effects
As of right now there are no reported side effects of Erase Pro. It is important to note that this product is only intended to be used by adults over the age of 21.
What Reviewers Say
GNC.com gives Erase Pro a 4.4 out of 5 based on 25 reviews. The majority say they would recommend Erase Pro to a friend. Some reported feeling dry joints and recommended taking a fish oil supplement along with Erase Pro.
A few people also reported that they didn’t experience any benefits.
Should You Buy Erase Pro?
Although the ingredients in Erase Pro are based on animal studies, their results are very promising. In addition to the studies, there seems to be enough anecdotal support from reviewers to suggest that Erase Pro does work.
That being said, only buy Erase Pro if it’s on sale. Otherwise it’s just too expensive, especially if you run for 8 weeks as recommended.
 Sreekumar Sreeja, Sreeharshan Sreeja; An in vitro study on antiproliferative and antiestrogenic effects of Boerhaavia diffusa L. extracts Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Volume 126, Issue 2, 12 November 2009, Pages 221-225
 Meera Sumanth and S.S. Mustafa, Antistress, Adaptogenic and Immunopotentiating Activity Roots of Boerhaavia Diffusa in Mice, International Journal of Pharmacology 3 (5): 416-420, 2007